Pharmacare would cost governments billions more per year but save economy money: PBO | CBC News

[ad_1]

The parliamentary budget officer says a single-payer universal drug plan would cost federal and provincial governments $11.2 billion in the first year, and $13.4 billion in five years.

The PBO released a report on Thursday that provides an estimate of the cost of a pharmacare program between 2024-25 and 2027-28. It follows up on a previous costing the PBO published in 2017 for a pharmacare plan.

The new report calculates the incremental cost of the program, taking into account current spending by governments on public drug plans as well as revenue that would be generated from co-pays under a pharmacare plan.

The Liberals have promised to table pharmacare legislation this fall as part of the supply-and-confidence deal the government struck with the NDP.

Currently, Canadians pay for their prescription drugs through a mix of public plans, private insurance and out-of-pocket spending.

Excluding hospital drugs, the PBO says total prescription drug spending was $36.6 billion in 2021-22, a 28 per cent increase from 2015-16.

Of that amount, 46 per cent was covered by governments, 40 per cent by private insurers and 14 per cent was paid-out-of-pocket.

Total spending on prescription drugs under a single-payer, universal pharmacare plan is expected to be $33.2 billion in 2024-25, rising to $38.9 billion in 2027-28.

However, the report also said such a plan would lead to economy-wide savings, despite its prediction that the use of prescription drugs would rise by 13.5 per cent.

That’s because the report assumes that the implementation of a single-payer universal plan would allow for better price negotiations, leading to lower drug prices.

WATCH: Singh says NDP will ‘force’ Liberals to meet pharmacare deadline 

Singh says NDP will ‘force’ Liberals to meet pharmacare deadline

Featured VideoNDP Leader Jagmeet Singh says a national pharmacare program needs to be universal, public and delivered on time.

The PBO estimates cost savings on drug expenditures of $1.4 billion in 2024-25 and says that figure would increase to $2.2 billion by 2027-28.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux said the economy-wide savings are lower than what was estimated in the previous report published in 2017 because his office now anticipates smaller savings from stronger drug price negotiations.

The economy-wide savings calculation does not take into account potential health care system savings from the rise in prescription drug use. Giroux said his office does not take on those kinds of cost-benefit analyses, which can be challenging.

In a statement Thursday, the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association said shifting from private to public coverage for pharmaceuticals is a bad move.

“A single-payer program will spend unnecessary billions to disrupt existing workplace health benefit plans that are already making a larger number of prescription drugs more affordable for millions,” said Stephen Frank, president and CEO of the Canadian Life and Health Insurance Association.

The implementation of a single-payer universal drug plan is expected to affect the private insurance industry by greatly reducing the need for private drug coverage.

Meanwhile, the non-profit advocacy group The Council of Canadians welcomed the PBO’s findings.

“The only real beneficiary of our current fragmented system is the pharmaceutical industry,” a statement from the organization said.

“We urge the Liberal government to introduce legislation for a public, universal, comprehensive pharmacare program without delay.”

WATCH: National pharmacare vote ‘should come’ before Christmas, Gould says 

National pharmacare vote ‘should come’ before Christmas, Gould says

Featured VideoAs the fall siting of the House of Commons begins, House Leader Karina Gould laid out government priorities, noting the debate on pharmacare should be free of partisanship.

The PBO report also looks at alternative coverage plans.

A plan that covers only catastrophic medicines — a term used to describe expensive drugs that could cause financial hardship — would cost governments an additional $400 million in the first year and $2 billion in five years.

Meanwhile, a plan that covers only essential medicines — ones that address the priority health-care needs of a population — would cost an additional $2.4 billion in the first year and $12.1 billion in five years.

The federal New Democrats have rejected the first draft of the Liberals’ pharmacare legislation. NDP health critic Don Davies said it didn’t meet expectations.

“It doesn’t meet the New Democrats’ red lines at this point,” Davies said. “We’re waiting for a next draft to come to us.”

Davies said the NDP will accept nothing less than a commitment to pharmacare paid for and administered through the public single-payer system, though it doesn’t have to happen all at once.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.